Juniper Enterprise Routing and Switching Support, Professional (JNCSP-ENT) - JN0-694 Exam Practice Test

-- Exhibit --
protocols {
bgp {
group isps {
type external;
peer-as 13090194;
multipath multiple-as;
neighbor ;
neighbor ;
}
}
}
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
The exhibit shows the complete BGP configuration for a router. The network operator reports that both peering sessions are up, but the router is not conducting per-flow load balancing over the connections to these two peers.
What are two causes for this behavior? (Choose two.)

-- Exhibit --
[edit routing-instances]
user@router# show vr1 routing-options
instance-import [ vr1 vr2 ];
[edit routing-instances]
user@router# show vr2 routing-options
instance-import [ vr1 vr2 ];
[edit routing-instances]
user@router# top show policy-options policy-statement vr1
term 1 {
from instance vr1;
then accept;
}
term 2 {
then reject;
}
[edit routing-instances]
user@router# top show policy-options policy-statement vr2
term 1 {
from instance vr2;
then accept;
}
term 2 {
then reject;
}
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
A network engineer wants to leak routes between routing instances vr1 and vr2. No routes from vr2 are showing up in vr1.
Which change should the engineer make to accomplish this task?

-- Exhibit - -- Exhibit -

Click the Exhibit button.
Your network has two connections to your ISP. You have been asked to load-balance traffic across both links that connect to your ISP. You have enabled multipath for this peer, but you are still not getting the expected load balancing.
Given the information shown in the exhibit, what else must you do?

-- Exhibit - -- Exhibit -

Click the Exhibit button.
On R1, the interface fe-0/0/1 is assigned to the default routing instance and fe-0/0/2 is assigned to a virtual router instance named VR-1.
Referring to the exhibit, the static route 200.200.200.200/32 is missing from the routing table of the default routing instance.
What should you do on R1 to resolve this problem?

-- Exhibit -user@router# run show log ospf-test ... Jun 10 22:35:38.598494 OSPF sent Hello 10.100.0.1 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77
area 0.0.0.0) Jun 10 22:35:38.598520 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.2, area 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:38.598543 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128 Jun 10 22:35:38.598564 dead_ivl 32, DR 10.100.0.1, BDR 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:41.522956 OSPF periodic xmit from 10.200.26.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL
2684276196 area 0.0.0.1)
Jun 10 22:35:42.798220 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.100.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77
area 0.0.0.0)
Jun 10 22:35:42.798311 Version 2, length 48, ID 10.100.1.1, area 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:42.798334 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
Jun 10 22:35:42.798356 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128
Jun 10 22:35:42.798377 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.100.0.2, BDR 10.100.0.1
Jun 10 22:35:45.189034 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.100.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77 area 0.0.0.0) Jun 10 22:35:45.189097 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.1, area 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:45.189118 checksum 0x0, authtype 0 Jun 10 22:35:45.189140 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128 Jun 10 22:35:45.189162 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.100.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:45.196969 OSPF DR is 10.100.1.2, BDR is 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:45.197050 OSPF sent Hello 10.200.26.1 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/0.0 IFL 69 area 0.0.0.1)
Jun 10 22:35:45.197076 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.2, area 0.0.0.1 Jun 10 22:35:45.197098 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128 Jun 10 22:35:45.197119 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.200.26.1, BDR 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:46.746900 OSPF periodic xmit from 10.100.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 2684276196
area 0.0.0.0) -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, what is preventing the OSPF neighborship with two directly connected routers using interface ge-1/0/3 from reaching the full state?

Referring to the exhibit, an administrator has configured dot1q-tunneling on the VLAN, but LLDP is not being tunneled.

What is causing the problem?